Control gap analysis

Use case · Compliance

catalog updated 51m ago
← All use cases

Control gap analysis

Compliance

Given your current policies and a target framework, find the gaps, rank them by audit risk, and draft remediation steps.

The routing recipe
Job typeComplex reasoningPolicyBest qualityConstraintsctx ≥ 128k
routes to
DeepSeek V4 Pro nvidia
nvidia:deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-pro
92.2
match score
97.5
task fit
52.2
cost
53.4
speed
Why this model from benchmarks & capabilities
  • "Complex reasoning" leans hardest on reasoning; DeepSeek V4 Pro scores 100/100 there — top-2 of 32 chat models.
  • Strength on this class of work shows up on GPQA Diamond, MMLU-Pro, BIG-Bench Hard, where DeepSeek AI models are competitive.
  • Cost: runs on NVIDIA free credits / self-hostable NIM — effectively $0 marginal. Speed: ~45 tok/s (estimated).
  • Chosen over NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B for higher task-fit (97.5 vs 96.5) & cheaper.
Capability the job needsWeightDeepSeek V4 ProCatalog rank
reasoning1.00100#2 of 32
math0.60100#1 of 32
knowledge0.5094#2 of 32
Relevant benchmarksGPQA Diamond MMLU-Pro BIG-Bench Hard LiveBench (reasoning) EconomicsCost: runs on NVIDIA free credits / self-hostable NIM — effectively $0 marginal.
Speed: ~45 tok/s (estimated).
vs runner-upChosen over NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B for higher task-fit (97.5 vs 96.5) & cheaper. (NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B, score 91.3)
Example result
Sample input ▾
Target: SOC 2 Type II. Current state: 'We have access reviews quarterly and encryption at rest. No formal incident response plan, no vendor risk reviews, change management is informal (PR approvals only).'
Top gaps vs SOC 2 Type II: 1. CC7.4 Incident Response — HIGH. No documented IR plan. Remediate: adopt an IR policy + runbook, define severities + on-call, run one tabletop. 2. CC9.2 Vendor Risk — HIGH. No vendor reviews. Remediate: build a vendor inventory, risk-tier them, collect SOC 2/DPAs for criticals. 3. CC8.1 Change Management — MED. PR approvals exist but undocumented. Remediate: write a change-mgmt policy mapping to your PR + CI gates (you likely already meet the control — just formalize evidence). Strengths already covered: CC6.x access reviews (quarterly), CC6.7 encryption at rest.
Test it on your own data
Sign in to continue

LLM Switchboard is private — sign in with Authly to access the control room.

Sign in with Authly
← Back to home