⊠
Deal-Risk Inspector
SalesFeed a full CRM deal record (stage, notes, email threads, activity log, close date, amount) and get a deal-health score, the specific risk patterns dragging it down, and the single highest-leverage next action.
The routing recipe
Job typeComplex reasoningPolicyBest qualityConstraintsctx ≥ 128k
routes to
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B nvidia
nvidia:nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b
93.7
match score
96.5
task fit
100
cost
59.5
speed
Why this model from benchmarks & capabilities
- "Complex reasoning" leans hardest on reasoning; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B scores 100/100 there — top-1 of 40 chat models.
- Strength on this class of work shows up on GPQA Diamond, MMLU-Pro, BIG-Bench Hard, where NVIDIA models are competitive.
- Cost: runs on NVIDIA free credits / self-hostable NIM — effectively $0 marginal. Speed: ~70 tok/s (estimated).
- Chosen over DeepSeek V4 Pro for cheaper & faster.
| Capability the job needs | Weight | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B | Catalog rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| reasoning | 1.00 | #1 of 40 | |
| math | 0.60 | #3 of 40 | |
| knowledge | 0.50 | #4 of 40 |
Relevant benchmarksGPQA Diamond MMLU-Pro BIG-Bench Hard LiveBench (reasoning)
EconomicsCost: runs on NVIDIA free credits / self-hostable NIM — effectively $0 marginal.
Speed: ~70 tok/s (estimated). vs runner-upChosen over DeepSeek V4 Pro for cheaper & faster. (DeepSeek V4 Pro, score 91.8)
Speed: ~70 tok/s (estimated). vs runner-upChosen over DeepSeek V4 Pro for cheaper & faster. (DeepSeek V4 Pro, score 91.8)
Example result
Sample input ▾
Deal: Northwind Health — SOC 2 Type II + HIPAA (iCompaas Growth)
Stage: Negotiation (moved from Proposal 9 days ago)
Amount: $48,000 ACV | Close date: was Jun 30, now pushed to Jul 31
Contacts engaged: Priya Shah, Security Analyst (sole contact, 11 touches)
Today: 2026-06-29
Activity log:
- May 12: Discovery call w/ Priya. Pain: lost an enterprise deal because no SOC 2; prospect customer asked for report by 'end of Q3'.
- May 20: Demo. Priya loved evidence automation, wants to displace their spreadsheet+consultant setup.
- May 28: Sent proposal. Priya: 'looks great, I'll run it by the team.'
- Jun 3: Priya asked about Drata comparison.
- Jun 9: Sent battlecard. Priya: 'thanks, still aligning internally.'
- Jun 18: Pushed close to Jul 31, note: 'Priya says budget approval takes time.'
- Jun 24: Left voicemail + email. No reply.
Notes: No VP/CISO or finance contact identified. No mutual action plan. No next meeting scheduled.
DEAL HEALTH: 41/100 — Critical
ONE-LINE READ: A real, dated compelling event is being run entirely through a single junior analyst with no economic buyer and no scheduled next step — this is a stall dressed up as 'Negotiation.'
RISK FLAGS (most severe first):
- [SINGLE-THREADED] High — 100% of 11 touches are with Priya Shah, a Security Analyst. No VP, CISO, or finance contact has ever been engaged (record: 'No VP/CISO or finance contact identified').
- [NO ECONOMIC BUYER] High — Budget owner never named or met; Jun 18 note 'budget approval takes time' confirms the actual approver is off-record and unworked.
- [NO NEXT STEP] High — No future meeting on the calendar since the Jun 24 voicemail+email went unanswered; no mutual action plan exists.
- [CHAMPION RISK] Med — Priya is an enthusiastic but junior champion ('I'll run it by the team', 'aligning internally') with no demonstrated internal power to pull budget.
- [COMPETITIVE / STATUS-QUO] Med — Jun 3 Drata question was answered with a battlecard but never confirmed resolved; risk of silent default to incumbent tooling or 'do nothing.'
- [SLIPPING] Med — Close date already pushed Jun 30 → Jul 31; 20 days with no prospect-initiated activity (last inbound Jun 9).
MOMENTUM: last forward step Jun 18 (close-date push — a backward signal, not progress); days stalled 20 (from Jun 9, the last prospect reply). Close-date integrity: LOW — Jul 31 is hope, not a buyer commitment.
WHAT'S MISSING TO COMMIT:
- Named economic buyer + a meeting on the calendar with them.
- The compelling event tied to a hard date — confirm the 'end of Q3' customer deadline and who owns the consequence of missing it.
- A mutual action plan working backward from that date through security review, legal, and procurement.
- Confirmation the Drata evaluation is closed in iCompaas's favor.
THE ONE ACTION: Use the customer's Q3 SOC 2 deadline as air cover to multi-thread up — ask Priya this week for a 20-minute joint call with her VP/CISO and whoever owns the budget, framed as 'let's confirm we can hit your customer's Q3 report deadline together.' This simultaneously surfaces the economic buyer, tests Priya's real internal power, and re-anchors a dead 'Jul 31' to a buyer-owned date. If Priya can't or won't open that door, downgrade this from Negotiation to Pipeline today.
Test it on your own data
/100 — \none-line read: \nrisk flags (most severe first):\n- [] — \nmomentum: last forward step , days stalled (from ), close-date integrity \nwhat's missing to commit: \nthe one action: ","task":"reasoning","optimize":"best_quality","mincontext":128000}'>